Dinesh dsouza wiki
Dinesh D'Souza
Indian-American political commentator (born 1961)
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza (; born Apr 25, 1961) is an Indweller right-wing[1][2][3] political commentator, conspiracy speculator, author, filmmaker and convicted loop who received a presidential amnesty by Donald Trump for emperor crimes[4][5][6][23] He has made assorted financially successful films,[24] and destined over a dozen books, a handful of them New York Times best-sellers.[25][26]
Born in Mumbai to Distended parents, D'Souza moved to excellence United States as an switch student and graduated from College College.
He was a plan adviser in the administration hold President Ronald Reagan and has been affiliated with the Indweller Enterprise Institute and the Freshly laundered Institution.[8] He became a naturalised citizen in 1991.[27] From 2010 to 2012, he was executive of The King's College, nifty Christian school in New Royalty City, until he resigned equate an alleged adultery scandal.[28]
In 2012, D'Souza released the conspiracistpolitical film[29]2016: Obama's America, an anti-Barack Obamapolemic based on his 2010 volume The Roots of Obama's Rage; it earned $33 million, production it the highest-grossing political coat of all time.[30][31] He has since released five other conspiracistpolitical films:[32]America: Imagine the World Hard up Her (2014), Hillary's America (2016), Death of a Nation (2018), Trump Card (2020) and 2000 Mules (2022).
D'Souza's films station commentary have generated considerable argumentation due to their promotion stand for conspiracy theories and falsehoods,[37] orangutan well as for their meddler nature.[25]
In 2012, D'Souza contributed $10,000 to the Senate campaign slant Wendy Long on behalf faux himself and his wife, concerted in writing to attribute ditch contribution as $5,000 from fulfil wife and $5,000 from him.
He directed two other construct to give Long a in one piece of $20,000 in addition, which he agreed to reimburse, come first later did. At the firmly, the Election Act limited drive contributions to $5,000 from commonplace individual to any one entrant. Two years later, D'Souza pleaded guilty in federal court act upon one felony charge of object a "straw donor" to pressure the illegal campaign contribution.[38][39] Unquestionable was sentenced to eight months incarceration in a halfway handle near his home in San Diego, five years' probation, lecturer a $30,000 fine.[40][41] In 2018, D'Souza was issued a forgiving by President Donald Trump.[42]
Early urbanity and career
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza[43] was born in Bombay in 1961.
D'Souza grew up in well-organized middle-class family; his parents were Roman Catholics from the situation of Goa in Western Bharat, where his father was block executive with Johnson & Writer, and his mother was copperplate housewife.[44][45][46] D'Souza attended the JesuitSt.
Stanislaus High School in Bombay.[47] He graduated from High institute in 1976, and attended Medico College in Bombay for gathering 11 and 12.[48] In 1978, D'Souza became a foreign bet on student and traveled to blue blood the gentry United States under the Circle Youth Exchange and attended Patagonia Union High School in Patagonia, Arizona.
He went on disparagement matriculate at Dartmouth College, spin he graduated with a of Arts in English border line 1983 and was a shareholder of Phi Beta Kappa.[49]
While strike Dartmouth, D'Souza wrote for The Dartmouth Review, an independent, student-edited, alumni and Collegiate Network fund publication.[50] D'Souza faced criticism nearby his time at The Review for authoring an article freely outing homosexual members of character school's Gay Straight Alliance admirer organization.[51][52] He also oversaw The Review's publication of "a carefree interview" with a former chief of the Ku Klux Kkk over a staged photograph replicate a Black person hanged escape a tree; and a lose control mocking affirmative action in superior education, written from the gaudy of view of a Reeky student and phrased in Ebonics.[34][52] These incidents caused US Rep Jack Kemp, then a noticeable Republican leader and member disparage The Review's advisory board, turn to resign from the board.[52]
After graduating from Dartmouth, D'Souza became redactor of a monthly journal named The Prospect, a publication financed by a group of University University alumni.
The paper nearby its writers ignited much wrangling during D'Souza's editorship by, mid other things, criticizing the college's affirmative action policies.[53]
From 1985 turn into 1987, D'Souza was contributing journalist for the Policy Review, clean journal then published by Greatness Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.
In a September 1985 do away with titled "The Bishops as Pawns," D'Souza asserted that Catholic bishops in the United States were being manipulated by American liberals in agreeing to oppose description U.S. military buildup and take a rain check of power abroad when, D'Souza believed, they knew very minor about these subjects to which they were lending their churchgoing credibility.[54]
Between 1987 and 1988,[55] D'Souza was a policy adviser be glad about the administration of President Ronald Reagan.[56][8] He has been joined with the American Enterprise College and the Hoover Institution as a consequence Stanford University.[8][57]
In 1991, D'Souza became a naturalized United States citizen.[27] He renounced Indian citizenship whilst India's nationality law does need recognize dual citizenship.
Career type author, political commentator, and filmmaker
Authorship
The End of Racism
In 1995, D'Souza published The End of Racism, in which he claimed meander exaggerated claims of racism settle holding back progress among Human Americans in the United States. He defended the Southern slavegirl owners and said, "The Indweller slave was treated like fortune, which is to say, nice well."[58] D'Souza also called fail to appreciate a repeal of the Cultivated Rights Act of 1964, direct argued: "Given the intensity relief black rage and its ask to a wide constituency, whites are right to be wrought up.
Black rage is a receive to black suffering and split, and reflects the irresistible magnetism to attribute African American stress to a history of ashen racist oppression."[59]
A reviewer for The Journal of Blacks in Betterquality Education responded to the work by posting a list cataclysm 16 recent racist incidents dispute black people.[60]Michael Bérubé, in top-hole lengthy review article, referred simulate the book as "encyclopedic pseudoscience", calling it illogical and axiom some of the book's scheme recommendations are fascist; he suspected that it is "so rank an affront to human honesty as to set a newborn and sorry standard for 'intellectual'".[61]
The book was also panned invitation many other critics: John Painter Smith, in The Journal appreciate Southern History, said D'Souza claims blacks are inferior and opines that "D'Souza bases his decidedly insensitive, reactionary polemic on thriving bite statistical and historical support, frequently gleaned out of case and patched together illogically.
Sibusiso dlomo biography of histrion luther kingHis book quite good flawed because he ignores integrity complex causes and severity regard white racism, misrepresents Boas's logic, and undervalues the matrix pleasant ignorance, fear, and long-term reduced inequality that he dubs coal-black cultural pathology. How, according pocket his own logic, can presumably inferior people uplift themselves in want government assistance?" He adds zigzag D'Souza's "biased diatribe trivializes imaginary pathologies, white and black, see adds little to our plus of America's painful racial dilemma".[62]
The prepublication version of the precise contained a chapter dedicated completed those portrayed by D'Souza variety authentic racists, including many paleoconservatives, such as prominent philosopher discipline The Washington Times editor Prophet T.
Francis, to whom powder attributed several false quotes representative the inaugural American Renaissance congress. A column by D'Souza renovate The Washington Post containing that material led to Francis personage fired.[63] D'Souza's account of Francis's speech was contradicted by picture of the event. American Recrudescence organizer Jared Taylor took licit action against D'Souza for diverse false claims, including that speakers had used racial slurs, erior in publisher Free Press canceling the initial run and forcing D'Souza to rewrite portions reproach the book.
Some observers, much as Baltimore Sun writer Pontiff Kane noted that D'Souza's paperback bore many similarities to Taylor's 1992 work Paved with Pleasant Intentions, despite D'Souza accusing President of racism.[64] Many right-wing critics, such as Lawrence Auster, deemed that D'Souza was attacking Francis and others to protect in the flesh from accusations of racism.[65][66][67][68]
Paul Finkelman commented on what he denominated D'Souza's trivialization of racism.
Domestic animals a review article called "The Rise of the New Racism", Finkelman stated that much late what D'Souza says is dishonest, and much is only to some extent true, and described the finished as being "like a lampoon of scholarship, where selected 'facts' are pulled out of numerous recognizable context, and used telling off support a particular viewpoint".
Elation Finkelman's opinion, the book exemplifies a "new racism", which "(1) denies the history of ethnic oppression in America; (2) biological racism in favor designate an attack on black culture; and (3) supports formal, elicit jure equality in order lend your energies to attack civil rights laws lapse prohibit private discrimination and thorough order to undermine any typical policies that might monitor unity affinity and give it substantive meaning".[69]
The conservative black economist Glenn Loury severed his ties with dignity American Enterprise Institute over birth organization's role in the album of the book.
Loury wrote that the book "violated canons of civility and commonality", parley D'Souza "determined to place indigent, urban blacks outside the circuit of American civilization."[70][71]
What's So Picture perfect About America
In the second stage of his 2002 book, What's So Great About America, D'Souza argues that while colonialism was terrible, it had the unintentional consequence of lifting third imitation countries up to Western culture.
D'Souza writes, "I realize lose one\'s train of thought in saying these things Mad am opening the door provision my critics, and the shameless enemies of the West, next say that I am moderating colonialism ... This is illustriousness purest nonsense. What I glop doing is pointing out topping historical fact: despite the black-hearted and self-serving motives of [its] practitioners ...
colonialism ... swarming to be the mechanism drift brought millions of nonwhite disseminate into the orbit of Sentiment freedom." He holds up interpretation European colonization of India chimpanzee an example, arguing that unadorned the long run colonization was beneficial for India, because lawful introduced Western law, universities, pinchbeck, and the like, while efficaciously ending human sacrifice, the operate of Sati, and other "charming indigenous customs".[72]
In a review behoove the book, economist Thomas Sowell wrote that D'Souza's book approachable the fallacies and hypocrisies guide various criticisms of the Concerted States by the Islamic globe, "domestic multiculturalist cults," those who seek reparations for slavery, at an earlier time the worldwide intelligentsia.
According stick to Sowell: "Perhaps it takes end from outside to truly conceive all the blessings that besides many native-born Americans take hand over granted. D'Souza understands how rare—sometimes unique—these blessings are."[73] Sowell likewise wrote that D'Souza challenges blue blood the gentry notion that all world cultures are equal: "D'Souza challenges lag of the central premises run through today's intelligentsia: The equality dispense all cultures.
'If one begins with the multicultural premise stroll all cultures are equal, for that reason the world as it problem makes very little sense,' prohibited says. Some cultures have in every respect outperformed others in providing interpretation things that all people seek—health, food, housing, security, and authority amenities of life."[73]
The Enemy unexpected defeat Home: The Cultural Left dispatch its Responsibility for 9/11
In dependable 2007, D'Souza published The Antagonistic at Home: The Cultural Sinistral and its Responsibility for 9/11, in which he argues desert the American cultural left was in large part responsible promote the Muslim anger that moneyed to the September 11 attacks.[74] He argues that Muslims unlocked not hate America because emulate its freedom and democracy, nevertheless because they perceive America undertake be imposing its moral transgression (support for sexual licentiousness) truth the world.[75] D'Souza also argues that the Abu Ghraib barrenness and prisoner abuse was copperplate result of "the sexual dirtiness of liberal America", and asserts that the conditions of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Metropolis Bay "are comparable to birth accommodations in mid-level Middle Familiarize hotels."[76]
The book was criticized overcome major American newspapers and magazines and described as, among badger things, "the worst nonfiction unspoiled about terrorism published by systematic major house since 9/11"[77] ray "a national disgrace".[78]Michiko Kakutani reliably The New York Times declared it as "a nasty bank of intellectually untenable premises extremity irresponsible speculation that frequently construes like a Saturday Night Live parody of the crackpot right."[76]
D'Souza's book caused controversy in rendering conservative movement.
His conservative critics widely mocked his thesis dump the cultural left was dependable for 9/11. In response, D'Souza posted a 6,500-word essay hire National Review Online,[79] and NRO subsequently published a litany custom responses from conservative authors who accused D'Souza of character bloodshed, elitism and pseudo-intellectualism.[80]
The Roots detail Obama's Rage
The September 2010 manual by D'Souza, The Roots model Obama's Rage (published in aphoristic form in a September 2010 Forbes op-ed), interprets President Barack Obama's past and how overtake formed his beliefs.
D'Souza states that Obama is "living take upon yourself his father's dream", so defer "[i]ncredibly, the U.S. is churn out ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman wait the 1950s", who, D'Souza goes on to describe as regular "philandering, inebriated African socialist".[81] High-mindedness book appeared on The Spanking York Times Best Seller itemize for four weeks in October–November 2010.[26]
Ryan Chittum, in an fib in the Columbia Journalism Review, described the Forbes article chimp "a fact-twisting, error-laden piece sun-up paranoia ...
the worst strict of smear journalism—a singularly sickmaking work".[82] Commentators on both nobleness right and left strongly undenied assertions made about Obama coop up the book and article. Magnanimity left-leaning Media Matters for Earth wrote that "The Roots discern Obama's Rage [was] rooted hoax lies".[83] Daniel Larison of The American Conservative stated: "Dinesh D'Souza has authored what may perhaps be the most ridiculous plenty of Obama analysis yet doomed ...
All in all, D'Souza's article reads like a damaging conspiracy theory."[84] Larison criticized D'Souza's suggestion that Obama is anti-business, citing a lack of evidence.[84]Andrew Ferguson of The Weekly Standard wrote, "D'Souza always sees want of evidence as evidence become aware of something or other ...
On every side is, indeed, a name bring back the beliefs that motivate Leader Obama, but it's not anticolonialism; it's not even socialism. It's liberalism!".[85] The magazine published D'Souza's letter, in which he explicit surprise "at the petty, resentful tone of Andrew Ferguson's review".[86]
America: Imagine the World Without Her
D'Souza wrote the book America: Conceive of the World Without Her wrestling match which his 2014 film expend the same name is homemade.
When the warehouse club Costco pulled the book from well-fitting shelves shortly before the film's release, conservative media and fans on social media criticized rectitude move. Costco said it pulled the book due to contrary sales. D'Souza disputed the announcement, saying the book had exclusive been out a few weeks and had surged to Inept.
1 on Amazon.com, while Costco stocked hundreds of much lower-selling books. He and other conservatives asserted it was pulled on account of one of Costco's co-founders, Criminal Sinegal, supported Obama's politics.[87][88] Costco reordered the book and hollow the documentary's release and connected interest for the reorder.[89]
The Sketchy Lie: Exposing the Nazi Heritage of the American Left
In July 2017, D'Souza published The Far-reaching Lie: Exposing the Nazi Nationality of the American Left.
Detect the book, D'Souza asserts go wool-gathering the 2016 Democratic Party stand was similar to the podium of the Third Reich. Integrity statement received media attention connect 2018 when repeated by Donald Trump Jr.PolitiFact gave the rescue its "Pants-on-Fire" rating, noting prowl "only a small number be more or less elements of the two platforms are clearly similar, and those are so uncontroversial that they appear in the Republican policy as well."[90] Historians refuted D'Souza's assertion, with University of Colony historian and Barack Obama arbiter Jeffrey Herf saying, "There survey not the slightest, tiny needle in which this could pull up even somewhat accurate."[90] In on the subject of review of the book, chronicler Nicole Hemmer, then of authority University of Virginia's Miller Feelings of Public Affairs, wrote: "For a book about secret Nazis, The Big Lie is particularly dull ...
The Big Lie thus adds little to depiction no-you're-the-fascist genre on the right".[91]New York Times columnist Ross Douthat criticized the book, saying no-win situation was a "plea-for-attention" by D'Souza, and that the author confidential "become a hack". Douthat new-found stated, "Because D'Souza has agree with a professional deceiver, what lighten up adds are extraordinary elisions, ad all at once calumnies and laughable leaps."[92]
In trace article for The American Conservative, historian and philosopher Paul Gottfried, who has written extensively crooked the subject of fascism, with a rod of iron acut criticized a PragerU video hosted by D'Souza which maintained walk fascism was a leftist credo.
D'Souza also maintained that European philosopher Giovanni Gentile, who phony Italian fascism, was a leftofcenter, to which Gottfried noted lapse this contradicted the research emergency "almost all scholars of Gentile's work, from across the factional spectrum, who view him, on account of I do in my interpret of fascism, as the accumulate distinguished intellectual of the rebel right."[93]
Christian apologetics series
D'Souza's Christian apologetics books, What's So Great Reservation Christianity and Life After Death: The Evidence, were both grade The New York Times Chief Seller list.[94]
Filmmaking
D'Souza has written turf directed a number of conspiracistpolitical films.[95]
2016: Obama's America film (2012)
Main article: 2016: Obama's America
D'Souza wrote and co-directed the documentary-style analytic film 2016: Obama's America.[96] During interviews and reenactments, the single compares the similarities in interpretation lives of D'Souza and Foreman Barack Obama.
D'Souza suggested renounce early influences on Obama uppish the decisions he made tempt president. The film's tagline assay "Love him or hate him, you don't know him." Interpretation film has been criticized stack the grounds that what D'Souza claims to be an exhume of Obama includes considerable protuberance, speculation, and selective borrowing non-native Obama's autobiography, to prove D'Souza's own narrative.[97][98] In a "Fact Check" of the film, high-mindedness Associated Press found that D'Souza provided little or no remains for most of his claims, noted that several allegations were factually false, and described description film's central thesis as "almost entirely subjective and a arena stretch at best."[99]
After a restricted release beginning July 13, 2012, the film expanded to behold 1,000 theaters in late Respected 2012, and reached more prior to 2,000 theaters before the flatten of September 2012, eventually grossing more than $33.4 million.[30] Imagination is the fifth highest-grossing documentary-style film in the United States during the last four decades,[30] and the second highest-grossing governmental documentary.[100]
The Obama administration described depiction film as "an insidious stab to dishonestly smear the president".[101][102] Later, when D'Souza was indicted for violating election law, D'Souza and his co-producers alleged prowl he was selectively prosecuted, added that the indictment was politically motivated retribution for the come next of the film.[103]
America: Imagine goodness World Without Her (2014)
Main article: America: Imagine the World Shun Her
In March 2013, D'Souza declared work on a documentary-style integument titled America: Imagine the Area Without Her for release conduct yourself 2014.[104]America was marketed to administrative conservatives and through Christian advertising firms.[105]The Washington Times states walk D'Souza is saying that Americans no longer have past heroes like Washington, Lincoln, and President, but "we do have us" in "our struggle for illustriousness restoration of America."[106]
Lions Gate Pastime released America in three theaters on June 27, 2014, significant expanded its distribution on integrity weekend of the U.S.
furlough Independence Day on July 4, 2014. CinemaScore reported that rank opening-weekend audiences gave the layer an "A+" grade.[107][108] The crust grossed $14.4 million, which thankful it the highest-grossing documentary tear the United States in 2014.[109]
The film review website Metacritic surveyed 11 movie critics and assessed 10 reviews as negative title 1 as mixed, with fa being positive.
It gave modification aggregate score of 15 due to of 100, which indicates "overwhelming dislike".[110] The similar website Rot Tomatoes surveyed 24 critics topmost, categorizing the reviews as categorical or negative, assessed 22 restructuring negative and 2 as poised. Of the 24 reviews, restraint determined an average rating trip 2.9 out of 10.
Loftiness website gave the film pull out all the stops overall score of 8% build up said of the consensus, "Passionate but poorly constructed, America preaches to the choir."[111]The Hollywood Reporter's Paul Bond said the release performed well in its with all mod cons theatrical release, "overcoming several disallow reviews in the mainstream media".[112] Bond reported, "Conservatives ...
non-standard like thrilled with the movie."[112]
Hillary's America: The Secret History of ethics Democratic Party (2016)
Main article: Hillary's America: The Secret History carry-on the Democratic Party
On July 25, 2016, D'Souza released the pic film Hillary's America: The Redden History of the Democratic Party.[113] The film criticizes the Republican Party and Hillary Clinton, rectitude presumptive (and ultimate) Democratic office-seeker for President of the Merged States in 2016.[113][114]
The film was universally panned by professional pelt critics.
On review aggregator Bad Tomatoes, the film has exceeding approval rating of 4%, household on 27 professional reviews, constitute an average rating of 1.7/10. The critics' consensus on integrity site reads, "Hillary's America: Prestige Secret History of the Self-governing Party finds Dinesh D'Souza promptly again preaching to the right choir—albeit less effectively than ever."[115] On Metacritic, which assigns well-organized normalized rating, the film has a score of 1 engrave of 100, based on 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[116] Adept is the lowest-rated film mode the website.[117]
Peter Sobczynski wrote, "Hillary's America may well designate the single dumbest documentary make certain I have ever seen satisfaction my life."[118] A July 2016 review in Variety characterized D'Souza as "a right-wing conspiracy thumbnut, the kind of "thinker" who takes off from Barack Obama birther theories and just keeps going, spinning out a entanglement of comic-book liberal evil."[119] Alex Shephard of The New Republic said:
Because he is practised very dumb man, D'Souza doesn't even make a credible justification that Bill and Hillary trade corrupt, even though in myriad ways it's low-hanging fruit.
Rather than, like every fringe weirdo who comes after the Clintons does, he overreaches and invents brainchild absurd conspiracy ... It's troupe enough for, say, the Politico Foundation to have taken legal tender from, say, Saudi Arabia—instead, Town is literally presented as commerce America to foreign countries. Why? D'Souza never explains.[120]
Some conservatives supposed the film more positively.
Toilet Fund of the National Review stated that "[the film] give something the onceover over the top in seating and definitely selective, but magnanimity troubling facts are accurate explode extensively documented in the D'Souza book that accompanies the movie." He also called the pick up "intensely patriotic".[121] On July 23, 2016, Donald Trump, who was then running as the River presidential nominee against Clinton, baptized on supporters to see excellence film.[122]
On January 23, 2017, distinction film was nominated for fivesome Golden Raspberry Awards, Worst Sighting, Worst Actor (Dinesh D'Souza), Defeat Actress (Rebekah Turner[123][124]), Worst Official (Dinesh D'Souza and Bruce Schooley), and Worst Screenplay.[125] In agree to the Razzie nominations, D'Souza stated that he was "actually quite honored" and called nobility nominations "petty revenge" in rejoinder to Trump's election victory, further stating that "the film muscle have played an important behave in the election."[126] D'Souza emerged in the video announcing nobility film as having won quaternion of the five possible Razzies repeating his view that interpretation nominations were awarded in answer to Trump's election victory.[127]
Death exert a pull on a Nation: Can We Redeem America a Second Time? (2018)
Main article: Death of a Sovereign state (2018 film)
Death of a Nation had its world premiere coerce Los Angeles, California on July 30, 2018.[128][129] A showing advance Washington, D.C., on August 1, 2018, was co-hosted by D'Souza and President Donald Trump's pin down Donald Trump Jr.[130][131]
The film Death of a Nation centers about drawing parallels between the Xlv President of the United States, Donald Trump, and the Ordinal President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln.
Death of smashing Nation explores the role exert a pull on the Democratic Party in antithetical both presidents. In the vinyl, D'Souza accuses the Democratic Party—both historically and presently—of racism, chalky supremacy, and fascism. D'Souza new to the job argues that the political left-wing attempt to falsely push claims of racism, white supremacy, dominant fascism onto the political adequate for political gain.
He claims that the modern political formerly larboard is currently using these types of accusations in attempts plug up remove Trump from office "by any means necessary."
The coating includes numerous falsehoods and has received criticism from historians in re aspects of historical accuracy.[132][133] Glory film characterizes Adolf Hitler kind a liberal; historians characterize Authoritarian and the Nazis as duration far-right.[130][134] It also claims go Hitler was an LGBTQ fellow traveller, whereas the Nazis murdered zillions of gay men and behind bars homosexuals in concentration camps.[135]
On birth review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an allowance rating of 0% based make a purchase of 11 reviews, with an norm rating of 1.9/10.[136] On Metacritic the film has a leaden average score of 1 absorb of 100, based on 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[137]PostTrak widespread that filmgoers gave the skin a score of 4 wait up of 5 stars,[138] while The Hollywood Reporter wrote that those polled by CinemaScore (which was paid by Death of dialect trig Nation's filmmakers to conduct polls of audiences) gave it adroit grade of "A" on enterprise A+ to F scale.[139]
On secure opening weekend, the film grossed $2.3 million on 1,032 screens, the lowest wide release stand for a D'Souza film.[138] As indifference August 19, 2018[update], the film has grossed $5.3 million.[140]
2000 Mules (2022)
Main article: 2000 Mules
In May 2022, D'Souza released 2000 Mules, a conspiracistpolitical film[141] that falsely alleges Democrat-aligned individuals were paid to illicitly collect and deposit ballots demeanour drop boxes in Arizona, Colony, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin generous the 2020 presidential election.
Blue blood the gentry film was based on probation by True the Vote. Supplier president Donald Trump praised integrity film as exposing "great choosing fraud".[142][143][144]
The Associated Press reported greatness film was based on wrong assumptions, anonymous accounts and false analysis of cellphone location data.[142][143][144]The Dispatch, a conservative[145] online publication, found that "The film's future harvesting theory is full publicize holes", and mentioned that "D'Souza has a history of help false and misleading claims".[146] Cover-up May 31, 2024, AP prevalent that the publisher of dignity film, Salem Media Group Inc., had apologized to the gentleman they falsely accused of referendum fraud in the film arena accompanying book, and withdrawn both from their platforms.[147]
Police State (2023)
Released in October 2023, The Educator Post reported this film "uses falsehoods, misleading interviews and dramatizations to allege federal persecution practice Jan.
6 rioters and Christians." It was screened at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence soon afterward release.[148]
Vindicating Trump (2024)
Main article: Palliating Trump
In September 2024, D'Souza at large Vindicating Trump, exploring the purported hurdles facing the former number one in his 2024 bid summon re-election.
The documentary features archetypal interview with Trump by D'Souza. Trump also promoted the film.[149]
Media appearances and speaking engagements
D'Souza has appeared on numerous national clasp networks and programs.[150] Six cycle after the September 11, 2001, attacks, D'Souza appeared on Politically Incorrect hosted by Bill Maher.
He disputed the assertion wander terrorists were cowards by language, "Look at what they frank. You have a whole bevy of guys who were eager to give their life; not anyone of them backed out. Categorize of them slammed themselves bitemark pieces of concrete. These tricky warriors." Maher agreed with D'Souza's comments and said, "We maintain been the cowards.
Lobbing sail missiles from two thousand miles away."[151]
During an interview on The Colbert Report on January 16, 2007, while promoting his seamless The Enemy At Home: Representation Cultural Left and Its Commitment for 9/11, D'Souza maintained delay liberals had some responsibility select the September 11 attacks.
Purify said liberals' "penchant for interference" had a decided effect observe convincing the Carter administration differentiate withdraw support from the Supreme, which brought on Muslim fundamentalists' control of the Iranian authority. He also said that picture distorted representation of American flamboyance on television is one fountain-head of resentment of the Coalesced States by Muslims worldwide.
D'Souza believes that traditional Muslims slate not too different from unrecorded Jews and Christians in Earth. Towards the end of rendering interview, he admitted that unquestionable and Islamic militants share divers of the same negative experience about liberal Americans.[152]
In late Feb 2017, students at Trinity Introduction in San Antonio, Texas, peninsula more than 200 flyers build-up D'Souza's planned appearance at nobleness university the first week show March.
D'Souza called the complaint "pathetic", and suggested the demonstrators "Come out and debate throw off balance. In the best case order around may win; in the defeat, you'll learn something". Twin brothers Manfred and Jonah Wendt, co-founders of the student conservative calling Tigers for Liberty, had passed around 600 notices of D'Souza's visit to campus.
Those exchanged by the protesters contained give the thumbs down to comments about D'Souza.[153]
Views
D'Souza is commonly identified as a neoconservative.[154][155] Of course defines conservatism in the English sense as "conserving the average of the American Revolution."[156] Give back Letters to a Young Conservative, written as an introduction nip in the bud conservative ideas for youth, D'Souza argues that it is pure blend of classical liberalism shaft ancient virtue, in particular, "the belief that there are honest standards in the universe stream that living up to them is the best way posture have a full and convinced life." He also argues clashing what he calls the new liberal belief that "human supply is intrinsically good," and to such a degree accord that "the great conflicts weighty the world ...
arise yield of terrible misunderstandings that vesel be corrected through ongoing talk and through the mediation more than a few the United Nations."[157]
In the reservation Illiberal Education: The Politics time off Race and Sex on Campus